Online Portfolio Blog

Setting up a portfolio on FT.com (see previous article) allows you to plot your portfolio performance, and compare it to a number of market index benchmarks. Here's the performance of a portfolio of 6 UK stocks compared to the FTSE 100:



However, the only way I've found to do this seems unnecessarily convoluted. The FT portfolio service allows you to enter stock and cash transactions, but I can find no way to fund a portfolio with cash, and then have subsequent share purchases reduce the cash total. Instead, when entering a share purchase, I have to enter a corresponding cash debit.

Am I being a dolt? Or could this be made more user-friendly?

Stock prices on the London Stock Exchange are quoted in pence, often referred to as GBX, occasionally referred to as GBp. Brokers usually report fees in pounds (GBP), so it's worth paying attention to the denomination. When entering transactions into an online portfolio most sites expect GBX for the share price of the transaction, and GBP for the fees and stamp duty (Google Finance is an exception, expecting GBX for both).

Recap: 1GBP = 100GBX

Today I noticed that the London Stock Exchange (LSE) website allows you to enter and monitor stock portfolios. Their site was slower than molasses in January when I was using it, but I persevered thinking that, for stocks traded on the LSE, the LSE might be able to provide a better online service than most.

Despite the fact that the LSE recently updated their portfolio services, I was to be pretty sorely disappointed. Here's a list of 5 things I think LSE need to do before anybody with an ounce of sense will use their free portfolio service:
Continue reading "Portfolios on the London Stock Exchange Website"

Setting up a portfolio to monitor on FT.com this weekend was rather interesting. They're trying to create a more user-friendly and feature-complete online portfolio monitoring system than any other site I've encountered. To try it out for yourself, go to FT.com and look under Services -> Portfolio.

One of the first things you'll notice is FT.com offers a comprehensive list of items to include in a portfolio: equities, exchange traded funds, managed funds, indices (for monitoring), cash and custom entries. It caters for both long and short positions, and even allows symbols to be entered under a "watch" status, not including these in portfolio valuations. Entering ticker symbols is made easier by a drop down of instruments that match whatever you type, including little flags to specify the exchange on which the instruments are traded. Another nice touch is that the required currency denomination is displayed where you enter the price: e.g. GBX for LSE-traded stocks. This common courtesy escapes the likes of Yahoo Finance, who appear uncertain of the difference between GBP and GBX in any case.

What really makes FT.com stand out from the crowd is their attempt to automatically handle dividends and to chart portfolio performance. Continue reading "FT.com Portfolio Services"

Lately Yahoo Finance has been having some serious trouble with UK stock price data.

First of all, there has been a recurring mix-up between pence and pounds in portfolios. UK share price values are normally listed in pence, e.g. a price of 211 means the stock is trading at £2.11 per share. Yahoo Finance manages to report the price correctly as 211p, but then sometimes calculates the value of an online portfolio, and the day's gain based on £211. This effectively multiplies your portfolio value by 100: while perhaps flattering, it is not terribly useful. This has been going on at least since yesterday, and has also happened at least once in the past.

Also, during one day this week, the market data reported by Yahoo Finance was different from that reported by e.g. Google Finance and the Financial Times website. Even the FTSE100 index had a huge variation. The explanation seems to be that uk.finance.yahoo.com does not have data for a large portion of Wed Sept 17th intraday data, whereas finance.yahoo.com does. Continue reading "Yahoo Finance: Pence, Pounds and Inaccurate Data"